Australian Capital Territory
Financial Management (Performance Criteria) Amendment 2013 (No 2) 
Notifiable instrument NI2013-37
made under the
Financial Management Act 1996, s19D (Amendment of performance criteria)

1	Name of instrument
	This instrument is the Financial Management (Performance Criteria) Amendment 2013 (No 2).
2	Commencement
	This instrument is taken to have commenced on 1 July 2012.
3	Amendment of 2012-2013 performance criteria
	The performance criteria for the 2012-13 financial year is amended as set out in schedule A.
4.	Statement of reasons for amendments
Section 19D (3) (f) of the Financial Management Act 1996 provides that the Minister may by instrument amend performance criteria if changes happen in the priorities of the Department.
5.	Revocation of Instrument
This instrument revokes Notifiable Instrument NI2013-27.

Simon Corbell MLA
Attorney‑General

21 January 2013   
SCHEDULE A

AMENDMENT OF PERFORMANCE CRITERIA UNDER SECTION 19D OF THE FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT ACT 1996

I amend the following performance criteria for the 2012-13 financial year.
Agency	Output Class and Output	Description of performance criteria	Targets	Action	
			2012-13
Budget papers	2012-13
Amended target		
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.3: Legislative Drafting and Publishing Services	1.3 a High level of client satisfaction for legislative drafting and publishing services by the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office:  percentage of satisfied clients	>85%	85%	Target amended	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.3: Legislative Drafting and Publishing Service	1.3.b Timely legislative drafting and publishing services by the Parliamentary Counsel’s Office:
Percentage of drafting responses provided within 30 day standard	>95%	95%	Target amended	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.3: Legislative Drafting and Publishing Service	1.3.b Percentage of notifications notified on ACT legislation register on requested notification day	>99%	99%	Target amended	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.3: Legislative Drafting and Publishing Service	1.3.b Percentage of republications of changed legislation published on ACT legislation register on day the change happens	>99%	99%	Target amended	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.5: Protection of Rights	1.5.a High level of client satisfaction with Human Rights Commission complaints process:
Percentage of complaints concluded within Commission standards and targets	75%	N/A	Measure deleted	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.5: Protection of Rights	1.5.a High level of client satisfaction with Human Rights Commission complaints process:
Percentage of complaints concluded within Commission standards	N/A	75%	New measure	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.5: Protection of Rights	1.5.b Human Rights Commission is respected as an agent of rights protection and service:
Number of participants in community education or engagement activities	5,000	N/A	Measure deleted	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.5: Protection of Rights	1.5.b Human Rights Commission is respected as an agent of rights protection and service:
Number of community engagement activities undertaken by the Commission.	N/A	30	New measure	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.5: Protection of Rights	1.5 c The Public Advocate of the ACT’s actions towards achieving a caring community where the rights and interests of vulnerable people are protected: Proportion of clients for whom advocacy services are provided by the Public Advocate of the ACT where a high level of satisfaction is reported	90%	85%	Target amended	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.5: Protection of Rights	1.5 c Public Guardianship - Guardianship clients: Percentage requiring intensive decision making support	35%	32%	Target amended	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.5: Protection of Rights	1.5 c Public Advocate - Individuals, excluding guardianship clients, brought to the attention of the Public Advocate - Total number.	2,200	2,020	Target amended	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.5: Protection of Rights	1.5 c Public Advocate - Individuals, excluding guardianship clients, brought to the attention of the Public Advocate - Percentage for whom individual or systemic advocacy was provided.	55%	30%	Target amended	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.7: Regulatory Services	1.7.d. High level of response to public complaints about faulty ticket machines and parking meters percentage response within 60 minutes	95%	N/A	Measure deleted	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 1: Justice Services
Output 1.7: Regulatory Services	1.7.e Percentage of parking meters operational within 24 hours from the time of failure reported	95%	N/A	Measure deleted	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 3: Courts and Tribunal
Output 3.1: Courts and Tribunal	3.1.b Reasonable cost of ACT Courts and Tribunals - Average fees collected per Supreme Court civil case	$800	$1,300	Target amended	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 3: Courts and Tribunal
Output 3.1: Courts and Tribunal	3.1.c Reasonable cost of ACT Courts and Tribunals - Average fees collected per Magistrates Court civil case	$45	$63	Target amended	
Justice and Community Safety Directorate	Output Class 3: Courts and Tribunal
Output 3.1: Courts and Tribunal	3.1.o Reasonable cost of lodgement at the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal (ACAT) - Average fees collected per ACAT matter where fees are paid	$115	$138	Target amended